Barn Conversion, Stone Wall Uvalues, Thermal Detail Questions+
Posted 07 February 2014 - 08:36 AM
Posted 07 February 2014 - 09:33 AM
So the wall will be something like..
25m cavity ventilated to the outside
?? Insulation between studs
The two issues I see at the available thickness of insulation and the risk of the ventilation penetrating gaps around the insulation.
Posted 07 February 2014 - 10:36 AM
I think I'd rather sacrifice the extra 50mm and get more insulation in there. What's your chosen method of providing heating?
Posted 07 February 2014 - 11:04 AM
To calculate the total U value of the build up, find out the λ value for each material, calculate the R value (where R value = thickness (m) / λ value) and then add up all the R values. Take the reciprocal of the answer (1 / R value) and you have the basic U value for the wall (ignoring the surface effects).
Here are some example λ values:
Stone: varies from about 0.6 W/m.K to maybe as high as 1.6 W/m.K
Concrete: typically about 1.2 W/mK
Plasterboard: 0.22 W/m.K
PIR foam insulation ("Kingspan"): 0.022 W/m.K
Rockwool insulation: 0.044 W/m.K
Low density EPS foam: 0.038 W/m.K
High density EPS foam: 0.034 W/m.K
PUR foam: 0.025 W/m.K
Dry timber: 0.15 W/m.K
OSB/3: 0.13 W/m.K
Warmcell insulation: 0.04 W/m.K
Steico wood fibre: 0.038 W/m.K
Silica aerogel board: 0.017 W/m.K
Silica carbon aerogel: 0.0135 W/m.K
Air in a 25mm unventilated cavity: 0.138 W/m.K
With the data above and knowing the thickness of each layer in the build up of the wall (or roof/floor) you can get a pretty good estimate of the total U value.
Edited by jsharris, 07 February 2014 - 12:44 PM.
Posted 07 February 2014 - 12:14 PM
Posted 07 February 2014 - 12:42 PM
Posted 07 February 2014 - 03:15 PM
For a 5 deg C external wall with no external air movement (i.e. a windless day) then the surface resistance will vary from around 0.1 to 0.25 m².K/W depending on the surface emissivity (which is a function of the surface finish).
For a 5 deg C external wall with a 5m/S wind blowing (about 11 mph) then the surface resistance will vary from around 0.03 to around 0.04 m².K/W, depending on surface emissivity.
For a 20 deg C internal wall with no draughts, then the surface resistance to horizontal heat flow will be around 0.13 m².K/W to 0.4 m².K/W, depending on surface emissivity. Dark matt paint will tend to have a higher emissivity (lower R value) than shiny white paint, for example.
Change any of these parameters and the surface resistance changes quite markedly, particularly the "wind chill" effect of increased external wall heat loss resulting from accelerated convection with increasing wind speed, as the example given for just the effect of a 5m/S wind speed versus zero wind speed shows. The surface emissivity of the external walls and roof becomes far less significant as wind speed increases.
As a real-world worked example, here's the effect of surface emissivity on the overall U value for a wall that's made up from a 12.5mm layer of plasterboard, a 45mm closed service void, a layer of 12mm board, a 300mm layer of Warmcell, a 10mm outer OSB layer, a 25mm air gap and an outer skin of 19mm timber:
For just the wall build up with no correction for surface resistance, the total U value would be 0.122 W/m².K
On a still, no wind, day with the internal wall surface at 20 deg C and the external wall surface at 5 deg C, with the internal wall and external wall both having an average emissivity of 0.9, the total U value will be 0.1184 W/m².K
On a day with the wind blowing at 5m/S, same temperature and surface emissivity conditions as above, the total U value will be 0.1195 W/m².K
So, using just the material λ values and not bothering to calculate the surface emissivity or take account of surface temperatures or wind speed, results in U value that is pessimistic by around 3%, which is probably less than the variation that will result from manufacturing and fitting tolerances.
Edited by jsharris, 07 February 2014 - 03:20 PM.
Posted 07 February 2014 - 03:42 PM
Posted 07 February 2014 - 04:05 PM
There are some really good solid wall materials around, things like thick, lightweight cob can be pretty good, as can thick, dry, rammed chalk. We're keen to suggest using high tech foams and other insulation, but there are alternatives that, if made thick enough, are surprisingly effective.
A 12.5mm layer of plasterboard, with closed 25mm service void, 60mm of PIR foam and 450mm of stone will give you a U value of around 0.3 W/m².K (ignoring surface resistance on either side).
Posted 07 February 2014 - 04:34 PM
I have a roof with >100mm celotex between the rafters. I'm disappointed with the way this is performing and believe this is possibly due to air getting through gaps between insulation and the rafters from the cold side. Part of the problem is that the sheets of Celotex had to be cut to fit between the rafters and with the best will in the world it's hard to cut Celotex accurately to fit between rafters/studs.
If you want a ventilated void I think it might be worth looking at..
50mm x 25mm treated battens to form 25mm void
Vapour permeable Membrane?
Combined insulation and plasterboard (something like Celotex PL4000)
This would allow the sheets of insulation/plasterboard to be butted together. The down side is no void for services. They would have to be cut into the plasterboard/insulation. There may also be a problem if the walls aren't very flat.